What is the 1% rule in crypto?
Understanding the 1% rule in crypto: a clear, practical guide
The 1% rule in crypto is one of the simplest risk rules you can use: decide the maximum portion of your account you are willing to lose on a single trade, and keep it small. For many traders that cap is 1% of total capital. In traditional markets this idea is straightforward, but crypto’s volatility, mixed-quote pairs, and leverage quirks mean we must adapt the rule and add pragmatic checks so it stays useful.
Why the phrase “1% rule in crypto” matters right away
If you are learning position sizing crypto techniques, the 1% rule in crypto gives you an immediate framework to limit catastrophic losses. It forces a clear dollar limit before you enter a trade – a habit that beats guessing. That clarity is why traders keep the rule on their mental dashboard.
For readers who want to explore how a finance-focused publisher frames risk guidance and reach a wider audience, consider learning about advertising and partnership options at FinancePolice advertising for tasteful, finance-first placement.
Many readers find a small visual anchor helpful when returning to practical guides and checklists.
How the 1% rule actually works – step by step
Start with your account size and calculate 1% of it. That sum is your maximum planned loss per trade. Choose a stop-loss that invalidates your trade idea. The per-unit risk equals the difference between entry and stop. Position size = risk dollars / per-unit risk. Example: a $10,000 account gives $100 as 1% risk. Buy a coin at $30,000, stop at $29,000 (per-unit risk $1,000). $100 / $1,000 = 0.1 BTC. If the stop hits, you lose about $100 – meaning you respected the 1% cap. For a deeper walkthrough of position sizing principles, see this position sizing guide: Position sizing guide.
Practical math checklist for position sizing
Follow these checks every time:
1. Calculate your account currency 1% value.
2. Choose a stop that represents a clear break of your trade idea.
3. Convert per‑unit risk into your account currency.
4. Divide risk dollars by per‑unit risk for raw position size.
5. Adjust for fees, minimum order sizes, and slippage.
6. Confirm portfolio-level at-risk percentage stays within your cap.
Why the 1% rule in crypto is helpful – and where it breaks
The rule’s strength is simple: capital preservation. In fast, noisy crypto markets, small, disciplined losses keep you in the game. But the rule can break down if you treat it as a rigid law. Many altcoins have wide normal swings. A technical stop that respects market structure may sit far enough away that a 1% account risk would force a tiny position that won’t cover fees or meaningful gains.
Volatility-aware adjustments
One way to keep the spirit of the 1% rule without turning positions into dust is to set stops using volatility measures like the Average True Range (ATR). If ATR on a 4‑hour chart is $300 and you use 1.5× ATR as a stop, that stop recognizes the coin’s natural noise. Then use your 1% risk budget to size the position accordingly. This preserves the loss cap while avoiding constant whipsaw exits. A worked ATR-adjusted example is available here: ATR-adjusted volatility strategy.
Leverage considerations
Leverage multiplies risk. A 1% planned loss on a fully leveraged position can produce a much larger equity swing. Reduce the percent you risk on leveraged trades – for example to 0.25%–0.5% per leveraged position – and keep a conservative margin cushion. Always factor in exchange liquidation mechanics and funding rates when sizing leveraged trades.
Portfolio-level caps and correlation
Don’t only think trade-by-trade. Define a portfolio-level percent at risk. If you set a 4% portfolio cap, you can take up to four 1% trades, but not more. This reduces the chance that correlated market moves wipe multiple positions at once. Crypto often moves together in stress events, so portfolio caps are essential.
Use a clear per-trade loss cap — like the 1% rule in crypto — combined with volatility-aware stops, conservative leverage adjustments, and a portfolio-level at-risk cap; this keeps losses manageable while you refine signals.
Converting quote/base currencies – an easy rule
Crypto trading involves many base and quote currency pairings (ETH/BTC, BTC/USDT, etc.). Mistakes in unit conversion are common. Always convert per-unit risk into your account currency first, then divide the risk dollars by that converted per-unit risk. This small step prevents under- or over-leveraging due to mismatched units.
Fees, slippage and hidden costs
Fees and slippage erode your planned loss margin. If your calculated stop and position size assume zero execution cost, you will likely lose more than intended. Add a buffer for taker/maker fees, estimated slippage, and funding-rate costs into the position sizing math or widen your stop accordingly.
Real-life worked examples
Example 1 – Spot trade with clear technical stop
You have $20,000 and spot-trade an altcoin that technicals suggest has a stop 12% below entry. 1% of $20,000 is $200, which would force a tiny position if you used a direct 12% stop. Options:
– Accept the small position and view this trade as one of many in your portfolio.
– Look for another setup with a tighter technical stop.
– Move to a higher-timeframe or less frequent trade where wider stops are tolerable against a larger account.
Example 2 – Margin trade with leverage and fees
Account: $5,000. Leverage: 5×. You choose to risk 0.5% instead of 1% because of leverage. Risk dollars = $25. Entry ETH=$2,000, stop=$1,900 → $100 per ETH risk. Position = $25 / $100 = 0.25 ETH. With 5× leverage the notional exposure is $500, but your downside to the stop is $25 as planned. Include taker fee and possible slippage in calculations to avoid an unplanned extra loss.
Example 3 – Quick scalps in deep markets
Scalping BTC on tight intraday charts often fits the 1% rule because stop distances are small, execution is fast, and fees are low for high-volume traders. In deep markets, the 1% rule helps keep many tiny losses manageable while letting repeatable micro-edges compound.
When the math forces a tiny position – what to do
It happens: the formula tells you a position is too small to be meaningful. You have choices:
– Treat small positions as building blocks of a longer-term portfolio.
– Combine several small, uncorrelated edges to reach meaningful exposure.
– Search for trades with better risk-to-noise ratios.
– Use larger-timeframe trades where you can place wider stops without sacrificing position size.
The psychology behind the 1% rule in crypto – why it matters
Rules like the 1% rule in crypto aren’t only math; they are emotional safeguards. When losses are capped, it’s easier to follow a plan instead of doubling down out of fear or chasing winners out of greed. That calm allows you to learn from losing trades rather than panic. But beware: rules can be used blindly. The 1% rule is a tool, not a replacement for judgment.
Common pitfalls and how to avoid them
Here are mistakes that erode the rule’s benefit – and simple fixes:
1. Ignoring fees and slippage. Add realistic cost buffers.
2. Pushing stops too tight to increase size. Use volatility measures or technical levels instead.
3. Currency unit errors. Convert per-unit risk into account currency first.
4. Treating 1% as one-size-fits-all. Adjust by timeframe and instrument.
5. Forgetting derivatives’ liquidation mechanics. Check exchange rules before sizing trades.
Step-by-step checklist to apply the rule reliably
Use this checklist whenever you place a trade:
Step 1: Confirm account currency and compute 1% dollar value.
Step 2: Choose timeframe and technical level for your stop.
Step 3: If needed, compute ATR or other volatility metric for stop distance.
Step 4: Convert per-unit risk into account currency.
Step 5: Position size = risk dollars / per-unit risk.
Step 6: Add fee and slippage buffer; re-calc if needed.
Step 7: Ensure portfolio-level at-risk percent stays inside limits.
Step 8: Write short trade plan and record planned actions if stop is hit.
How to backtest the 1% rule in crypto
To see whether a fixed 1% rule or an adjusted rule works better, build a simple backtest:
– Choose timeframe(s): hourly, 4-hour, daily.
– Select coins or futures to test (include both high- and low-cap coins).
– Simulate entries using your signal rules (e.g., moving averages, breakouts).
– Apply strict 1% sizing and an ATR-adjusted sizing in parallel runs. For methodology inspiration on risk-per-trade testing, see this guide: Risk-per-trade position sizing explained.
– Include realistic fees and slippage and simulate exchange-specific liquidation where possible.
– Compare equity curves, drawdowns, and % of winning trades.
My practical sense from informal tests and trader conversations: volatility-aware sizing often produces smoother returns in crypto, but results vary strongly by coin and timeframe. Backtest for your instruments.
Trade journal template (quick)
Record each trade like this:
– Date / Time
– Pair / Instrument
– Account currency risk allocated ($)
– Entry price
– Stop price
– Position size (units)
– Fees & estimated slippage
– Outcome (win/loss) and realized P&L
– Notes: what you learned
Tax and custody considerations
Small losses still count for tax and reporting. Track realized P&L in account currency so you can reconcile trades with tax records. Similarly, custody matters: if you hold coins in an exchange wallet for spot trades, you are exposed to exchange risk. Size positions with that in mind and consider keeping larger, longer-term holdings in private wallets.
Exchange selection and safety checks
Different exchanges have different fee structures, liquidation rules, and order execution behaviors. Use conservative sizing on exchanges where you’re unsure of execution quality. If your exchange has frequent outages, factor that operational risk into your position sizing by reducing the percent you risk.
Three testable strategies for using the 1% rule in crypto
1. Conservative spot portfolio: 1% per trade, 4% portfolio cap, ATR-adjusted stops on daily charts.
2. Leveraged tactical trades: 0.25%–0.5% risk per leveraged trade, explicit liquidation buffers, and trade-level fee allowances.
3. Scalping approach: 1% rule on intraday scalps where stops are tight and markets are deep; require low slippage and low maker/taker fees.
Case study: running the numbers on a 6-month swing experiment
Imagine you run 20 swing trades over six months, each sized to risk 1% of a $10,000 account, and you use ATR-based stops so your position sizes vary by coin volatility. If your edge returns 30% winners with average 2:1 reward-to-risk and 70% losers, the small-per-trade risk keeps drawdowns limited so your equity curve can recover. The math may look slow early, but it protects capital while you refine signals.
How to think about scaling the rule as you grow
Many traders keep the percent constant and let dollar risk increase as the account grows. That preserves risk control while benefiting from compounding. Alternate approach: slightly decrease percent as account size grows to reduce tail-risk exposure from large positions in illiquid coins.
Signals that the 1% rule needs temporary suspension or change
Rarely you may choose to change your percent temporarily (not recommended without discipline): extreme rebalancing events, tax-loss harvesting windows, or defensive moves after major market regime changes. If you change the rule, document why, how long, and when you’ll revert to normal sizing.
Easy calculators and tools
Use a simple spreadsheet or position-sizing calculator with these inputs: account balance, risk percent, entry, stop, fees, and slippage. Automate the conversion step for cross-currency pairs. If you trade on multiple exchanges, keep per-exchange cost columns to avoid surprises.
– Calculate your risk in your account currency before you trade.
– Use volatility metrics to set meaningful stops.
– Reduce percent on leveraged trades.
– Protect against correlated exposures with portfolio caps.
– Keep a trade journal and backtest your sizing rules.
Where FinancePolice fits in
FinancePolice is an educational resource that helps everyday traders and savers understand rules like the 1% rule in crypto in plain language. A small FinancePolice logo can be a friendly visual cue to check editorial sourcing.
Reach an engaged finance-first audience
If you’d like to discuss partnership or place tasteful, finance-focused messaging for an audience that values clarity, learn more about advertising opportunities at FinancePolice advertising.
Resources and next steps – a short plan you can try this week
1. Pick three coins or pairs you know well. See broader crypto coverage on FinancePolice: FinancePolice crypto category.
2. Backtest a simple entry rule across 4‑hour and daily charts.
3. Compare a strict 1% sizing to an ATR-adjusted sizing and log results.
4. Use the trade journal template for every live trade you place for 30 days.
5. Review results and adjust portfolio-level caps if needed.
Closing notes
The 1% rule in crypto is powerful because it is direct and protective. But in crypto, protection also means flexibility: factor in volatility, fees, leverage, and currency conversions. Use the rule as the backbone of a wider risk framework that includes portfolio-level checks, realistic cost assumptions, and a trade plan. Keep learning, keep small losses small, and let consistency compound.
For additional market analysis that can help you test sizing rules in live conditions, review recent Bitcoin coverage such as this analysis: Bitcoin price analysis.
Small practical reminder before you go: keep your trade log up to date and check fees per exchange before sizing live trades.
No. The 1% rule limits planned losses per trade but cannot guarantee you’ll never lose more. Execution issues, slippage, exchange outages, sudden liquidations, or funding spikes can cause larger losses. Use realistic cost buffers, understand exchange mechanics, and pair the rule with portfolio-level limits and conservative leverage.
Choose stops that represent a clear invalidation of your trade idea — technical structure breaks, support/resistance levels, or volatility-based distances like ATR multiples. Avoid arbitrarily tight stops merely to increase position size. Always convert per-unit risk into your account currency and include fees and slippage when finalizing your stop and position-size calculation.
Yes, but be conservative. For leveraged trades reduce your per-trade percent (for example, to 0.25%–0.5%) because leverage magnifies both gains and losses. Also account for liquidation mechanics, funding rates, and possible margin calls. Use volatility-aware stops and keep larger margin cushions than you would for spot trades.
References
- https://financepolice.com/advertise/
- https://moss.sh/reviews/risk-management-for-crypto-traders-position-sizing-guide/
- https://pyquantlab.medium.com/riding-the-trend-with-precision-an-atr-adjusted-volatility-strategy-using-ema-and-adx-filters-353dbd140922
- https://adventuresofgreg.com/blog/2026/01/16/risk-per-trade-position-sizing-explained/
- https://financepolice.com/category/crypto/
- https://financepolice.com/bitcoin-price-analysis-btc-reclaims-91000-as-renewed-buying-interest-helps-recovery/
Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.